Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.68 vs 1.38, Δ 0.30).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1.68Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 237 | Accurate passes | 526Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 591Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |