Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.72 vs 0.66, Δ 0.06).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 213 | Accurate passes | 526Lead |
| 282 | Total passes | 608Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.69 | Goals prevented | -0.69 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |