Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (2.44 vs 1.72, Δ 0.72).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2.44Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 362 | Accurate passes | 442Lead |
| 441 | Total passes | 509Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.14 | Goals prevented | 1.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |