Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (2.04 vs 1.76, Δ 0.28).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (19 vs 15 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 37%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.76 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 330 |
| 408Lead | Total passes | 380 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -1.07 | Goals prevented | -1.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |