Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (19 vs 5 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 26%).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 288 | Accurate passes | 333Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 404Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 10Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 17Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |