Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (2.39 vs 0.93, Δ 1.46).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Nashville SC held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.93 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 446Lead | Accurate passes | 339 |
| 505Lead | Total passes | 394 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.