Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.54 vs 0.86, Δ 0.68).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 446Lead | Accurate passes | 409 |
| 510Lead | Total passes | 473 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.76 | Goals prevented | 0.76 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.