Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (3.06 vs 3.28, Δ 0.22).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (17 vs 15 shots).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 3.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.28Lead |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 362 | Accurate passes | 566Lead |
| 414 | Total passes | 620Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.61 | Goals prevented | 1.61 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.