Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (2.13 vs 1.81, Δ 0.32).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.81 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 254 | Accurate passes | 435Lead |
| 339 | Total passes | 526Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.43 | Goals prevented | 0.43 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.