Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 13%).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 317 | Accurate passes | 503Lead |
| 376 | Total passes | 569Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |