Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.10 vs 1.72, Δ 0.62).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- Nashville SC held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.10 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 322 |
| 472Lead | Total passes | 396 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |