Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (20 vs 1 shots).
- Moca was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 50%).
- Nashville SC held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Moca |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 1 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Moca |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 93%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 593Lead | Accurate passes | 197 |
| 640Lead | Total passes | 264 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Moca |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Moca |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Moca |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.