Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (3.41 vs 0.63, Δ 2.78).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (26 vs 8 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 3.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.63 |
| Offsides | ||
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 480Lead | Accurate passes | 280 |
| 574Lead | Total passes | 357 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 1.03 | Goals prevented | 1.03 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |