Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (2.77 vs 0.93, Δ 1.84).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (14 vs 4 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 2.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.93 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 | Shots off target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 539Lead | Accurate passes | 440 |
| 610Lead | Total passes | 488 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 1.10 | Goals prevented | 1.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.