Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (3.23 vs 0.56, Δ 2.67).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 490Lead | Accurate passes | 337 |
| 535Lead | Total passes | 409 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -1.60 | Goals prevented | -1.60 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |