Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (2.71 vs 0.50, Δ 2.21).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (24 vs 9 shots).
- Nashville SC held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 514Lead | Accurate passes | 352 |
| 591Lead | Total passes | 443 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
| 0.96 | Goals prevented | 0.96 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.