Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 0.90, Δ 0.16).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- San Jose Earthquakes was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 381Lead | Accurate passes | 321 |
| 457Lead | Total passes | 391 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nashville Sc | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |