Match statistics snapshot
- Nea Salamis created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 0.11, Δ 1.92).
- Nea Salamis fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Nea Salamis was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nea Salamis | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.11 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nea Salamis | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 293Lead | Accurate passes | 230 |
| 358Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nea Salamis | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nea Salamis | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nea Salamis | Statistic | Enosis |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |