Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (1.25 vs 0.88, Δ 0.37).
- Almere City FC fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.25Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 319Lead | Accurate passes | 240 |
| 454Lead | Total passes | 368 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |