Match statistics snapshot
- AZ Alkmaar created the clearer chances on xG (0.56 vs 1.38, Δ 0.82).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- AZ Alkmaar was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 0.56 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 434Lead | Accurate passes | 366 |
| 510Lead | Total passes | 450 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |