Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (1.38 vs 1.01, Δ 0.37).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- AZ Alkmaar was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 1.38Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.01 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 369 | Accurate passes | 390Lead |
| 432 | Total passes | 459Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.16 | Goals prevented | -1.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Az Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.