Match statistics snapshot
- Feyenoord created the clearer chances on xG (1.64 vs 3.68, Δ 2.04).
- Feyenoord fired more attempts (21 vs 12 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 1.64 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.68Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 198 | Accurate passes | 529Lead |
| 271 | Total passes | 595Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.