Match statistics snapshot
- Feyenoord created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 1.27, Δ 0.15).
- Feyenoord fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Feyenoord held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.27Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 201 | Accurate passes | 472Lead |
| 297 | Total passes | 553Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.86 | Goals prevented | 0.86 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |