Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (1.00 vs 0.25, Δ 0.75).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Fortuna Sittard |
|---|---|---|
| 1.00Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.25 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Fortuna Sittard |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 379 | Accurate passes | 442Lead |
| 441 | Total passes | 513Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Fortuna Sittard |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Fortuna Sittard |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -2.75 | Goals prevented | -2.75 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Fortuna Sittard |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.