Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (1.33 vs 0.34, Δ 0.99).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.34 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 345 | Accurate passes | 489Lead |
| 420 | Total passes | 545Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.18 | Goals prevented | -0.18 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.