Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (2.22 vs 1.38, Δ 0.84).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (22 vs 11 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 2.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 354Lead | Accurate passes | 262 |
| 441Lead | Total passes | 370 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| -0.85 | Goals prevented | -0.85 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |