Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (3.33 vs 0.84, Δ 2.49).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (26 vs 7 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 3.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.84 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 511Lead | Accurate passes | 263 |
| 567Lead | Total passes | 337 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.