Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (2.11 vs 1.22, Δ 0.89).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Telstar |
|---|---|---|
| 2.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Telstar |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 458Lead | Accurate passes | 157 |
| 535Lead | Total passes | 243 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Telstar |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Telstar |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.80 | Goals prevented | 1.80 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Telstar |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |