Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (1.89 vs 1.46, Δ 0.43).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (27 vs 8 shots).
- Telstar was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Telstar |
|---|---|---|
| 1.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.46 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Telstar |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 492Lead | Accurate passes | 160 |
| 552Lead | Total passes | 228 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Telstar |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Telstar |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.74 | Goals prevented | 0.74 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Telstar |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.