Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (2.34 vs 1.91, Δ 0.43).
- Utrecht fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 2.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.91 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 304 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 384 | Total passes | 531Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.