Match statistics snapshot
- Vitesse created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 1.25, Δ 0.14).
- Vitesse fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 45%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 383Lead | Accurate passes | 188 |
| 479Lead | Total passes | 262 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.