Match statistics snapshot
- NEOM created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 0.55, Δ 1.05).
- NEOM fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Al-Ettifaq was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-ettifaq |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 6 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-ettifaq |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 387Lead | Accurate passes | 220 |
| 440Lead | Total passes | 275 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-ettifaq |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-ettifaq |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.42 | Goals prevented | -0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-ettifaq |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.