Match statistics snapshot
- NEOM created the clearer chances on xG (2.50 vs 1.38, Δ 1.12).
- Al-Hazm fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- NEOM was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 2.50Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38 |
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 386Lead | Accurate passes | 290 |
| 461Lead | Total passes | 354 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goals prevented | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.