Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Qadisiyah FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 1.83, Δ 0.48).
- NEOM fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-qadisiyah Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.83Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-qadisiyah Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 423Lead | Accurate passes | 377 |
| 477Lead | Total passes | 448 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-qadisiyah Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-qadisiyah Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.26 | Goals prevented | 1.26 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Neom | Statistic | Al-qadisiyah Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |