Match statistics snapshot
- Austin created the clearer chances on xG (1.05 vs 1.12, Δ 0.07).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Austin was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 1.05 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 309 | Accurate passes | 315Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 386Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.