Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 0%).
- New England Revolution held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 348Lead | Accurate passes | 239 |
| 438Lead | Total passes | 343 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |