Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (2.16 vs 0.58, Δ 1.58).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 2.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.58 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 479Lead | Accurate passes | 317 |
| 569Lead | Total passes | 406 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |