Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 1.00, Δ 0.37).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 474Lead | Accurate passes | 263 |
| 538Lead | Total passes | 336 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.52 | Goals prevented | -0.52 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.