Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 1.21, Δ 0.56).
- CF Montreal fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 216 | Accurate passes | 443Lead |
| 288 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.93 | Goals prevented | -0.93 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 23 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.