Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 1.26, Δ 0.17).
- Charlotte fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 376Lead | Accurate passes | 365 |
| 458Lead | Total passes | 457 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.