Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.58 vs 1.10, Δ 0.48).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1.58Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10 |
| Offsides | ||
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 474Lead | Accurate passes | 379 |
| 536Lead | Total passes | 438 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.04 | Goals prevented | -0.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |