Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (2.32 vs 1.07, Δ 1.25).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- New England Revolution held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2.32Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 381 |
| 499Lead | Total passes | 461 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.