Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.54 vs 0.90, Δ 0.64).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box |
| 3 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 521Lead | Accurate passes | 257 |
| 614Lead | Total passes | 348 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.