Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (0.65 vs 1.44, Δ 0.79).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 312 | Accurate passes | 493Lead |
| 389 | Total passes | 577Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.79 | Goals prevented | -0.79 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.