Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (2.21 vs 0.81, Δ 1.40).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 2.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 514Lead | Accurate passes | 171 |
| 585Lead | Total passes | 241 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| -0.13 | Goals prevented | -0.13 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.