Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.25 vs 3.15, Δ 1.90).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.15Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 312 | Accurate passes | 478Lead |
| 363 | Total passes | 535Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.14 | Goals prevented | -0.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |