Match statistics snapshot
- DC United created the clearer chances on xG (0.59 vs 0.95, Δ 0.36).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.59 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.95Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 447Lead | Accurate passes | 228 |
| 562Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.99 | Goals prevented | -0.99 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.