Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 0.93, Δ 0.23).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.93 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 406Lead | Accurate passes | 349 |
| 465Lead | Total passes | 420 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.23 | Goals prevented | -1.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.