Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 25%).
- New England Revolution held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 426Lead | Accurate passes | 318 |
| 505Lead | Total passes | 414 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |