Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (4.83 vs 1.94, Δ 2.89).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 4.83Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.94 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 371Lead | Accurate passes | 275 |
| 475Lead | Total passes | 382 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.